Originally Posted by jspchief
Romo is exponentially better than Cassel. Anyone claiming they are similar is ignorant.
That being said, bringing in Tony Romo is a textbook Chiefs QB move. We've been pulling this shit for almost 40 years. Outside of a short Montana era and Trent Green (playing behind a historic Oline), it has been an absolute failure of an approach to filling the position. Yes, Romo would make the team better. Yes, he might make us a playoff team. But ultimately it's the same play it safe, don't risk too much approach to filling the most important spot on the roster. It's the Martyball of team-building.
I don't want to bring in Romo at all. I can't stand that guy.
I just know he's way better than Matt Cassel.