Originally Posted by patteeu
The first paragraph is premised on the fact that "correlation proves causation" is a logical fallacy. I wouldn't have thought that needed to be spelled out.
The second paragraph is pretty self evident as well and I'll leave it up to anyone who reads it to judge the merits of the conclusions listed.
Again, no supporting premises.
Introduce something to the conversation, or stick to platitudes. But don't pretend you're doing the former when you're just swimming in the latter.