Originally Posted by Direckshun
Being rich is not a huge knock.
Appearing as being for the rich at the expense of everybody else, however, is.
Which is the hole Romney's allowed Obama to pigeon him into, and which he's just done an awful job demonstrating otherwise.
Huh? Care to specify what this means? Which modes of profit meet with your high standards, and which do not?
Is it your position that if you were presented with the opportunity to earn the same amount of profits in the same manner by which Romney realized his financial successes you would decline to do so?
The jealousy and class envy that oozes out of some of you is disgusting.