Originally Posted by patteeu
Problem the second – After complaining about Birk using circular reasoning, Kluwe does something very similar here. Essentially he argues that just because we haven't fixed a problem (with a constitutional ban on divorce) that it must not be a problem.
Kluwe doesn't appear to be arguing that or even implying that. What Kluwe is doing in that section is calling into question the priorities of Birk and those of like mind. He's targeting Birk's rhetoric.