Originally Posted by DaveNull
It's not that it's "some kind of horrible crime." It's that it's disingenuous to imply that by being "fair and balanced" someone could in theory use them as their only source of news when taken in the aggregate their programming is largely opinion based and presented from a right wing viewpoint.
Their 'news' comes from the same place as every other 'news channel'. All of our news comes from the same place! Reuters and AP. Since one owns the other, we really only have one source of news.
The rest is narrative. Narrative IS NOT NEWS... but you can listen to someone's bullshit and get a lot of news the 'other side' (regardless of which side) is ignoring. Every media outlet promotes a political narrative and all of them insist there is no such narrative. What I'm asking is why is it okay for everyone else but not okay for Fox?
I agree it's disingenuous.