Originally Posted by vailpass
My mistake. Where were the positive results published and why wasn't he suspended or penalized at the time the positive results came in?
Other than a verifiable positive test result there is only hearsay, no matter who is doing the saying.
There are blood samples from 2009 and 2010. He decided not to fight them. It's like charging "no contest" to a crime. "I'm going to say I didn't do it, but you have overwhelming proof, so **** it - here's my public relations team."