Quote:
Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP
He was a ****ing stud at Pitt whose strength was catching the ball down the field. I'll reserve judgment until we have a real QB on the field and until we actually call routes longer than 5 yards.
|
Likewise.
There's way too much talent there for me to give up on him. Even if he's nothing more than a deep ball specialist, he can be a good player. Hell, Vincent Jackson does little more than run downfield and catch jump-balls and people consider him a #1 wideout.
Baldwin is erratic, but the guy never sees the ball. Give him some passes and he'll get into rhythm better. Oh yeah, and how 'bout we use him as his skills indicate - a downfield threat?
Baldwin will be a good WR as soon as he is somewhere with a legitimate NFL quarterback and an offense that even attempts to incorporate this newfangled 'route tree' thing.