Originally Posted by Direckshun
That's what I figured.
The problem with the definition you provided for yourself of what propaganda is, is that you set it so specifically that not only does Drudge fail to reach it, but every other propaganda outlet on earth does, too.
Here's how it is commonly defined:
Before I continue, I want to do know: does this sound like an adequate definition of propaganda to you?
Sure, but Drudge does not lie by omission, he presents a link to the entire article, and despite your claims, not 100% of his links are to republican sites.
If Drudge was only presenting parts of the news stories, I think the argument that he is a propaganda machine would be much more valid.
Even if you think Drudge fits that definition, then you must agree that HuffPo fits that definition as well. Since you cannot concede that basic point, it makes any argument you attempt to articulate merely a front row seat to your hypocrisy.