View Single Post
Old 11-07-2012, 11:12 PM   #93
petegz28 petegz28 is offline
Supporter
 
petegz28's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Olathe, Ks
Casino cash: $28272
Quote:
Originally Posted by tk13 View Post
I get the concept, but I don't understand why dividing it up at a county level is a better idea than any other process. The vote is still based on a state level... in Nevada for instance, there are obviously way more people in the blue counties than red counties... or Romney would've won the state. Why would you punish people for living in a more populated county? There doesn't seem to be a point to the idea beyond that.
It's not punishing them at all. It's spreading out the EC votes so that the less populated areas still have an effective say in the overall outcome of the election. 2 states already do it and both are much, much smaller than CA.

So I guess the question is, why would you punish people for living in a less populated area?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good View Post
Call it whatever you want. I don't care about the verbiage.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good View Post
Then be more specific as to what you're bitching about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmo20002 View Post

What have I been hypocritical about?
Posts: 69,125
petegz28 is obviously part of the inner Circle.petegz28 is obviously part of the inner Circle.petegz28 is obviously part of the inner Circle.petegz28 is obviously part of the inner Circle.petegz28 is obviously part of the inner Circle.petegz28 is obviously part of the inner Circle.petegz28 is obviously part of the inner Circle.petegz28 is obviously part of the inner Circle.petegz28 is obviously part of the inner Circle.petegz28 is obviously part of the inner Circle.petegz28 is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote