Originally Posted by Direckshun
This is golden.
Billionaires should not be able to pour unlimited funds into elections = billionaires should have no political speech rights.
Life must be so simple for your binary method of rationalization.
Wonder how that compares with the ever so nuanced dichotomy between 'free speech' which of course must be protected in a free society, and 'unfettered expression of a point of view' which is poisonous and must be regulated.