Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO
Dude you are the one who has it backwards...
Tannehill at eight is a good example, RG3 going at two and being worth three firsts plus.
Those don't happen if the players also would get 50 million plus...
But I wouldn't expect you too understand this, Scott. You took Tyson Jackson at three AND paid him sixty million.
Posted via Mobile Device
I see your point and you are right about RG3 and Tannehill. They are in the same argument. However, the Tyson Jackson argument is ****ing stupid. Look at the top 10 picks that year. It was a horrible draft class. Guess what? Everyone knows this is also a very weak class.