Originally Posted by mlyonsd
I don't care what you think of me but the original point stands.
It's ironic there were rules of interrogation in place but nothing specific about using drones that causes innocent people to die.
Look you stupid buffoon...The only ironic thing is you don't understand the difference between killing someone on accident during a chaotic situation not under your control and killing/torturing someone ON PURPOSE while the situation is under your complete control.
The fact you continue to blabber on about not getting it just shows what a ****ing tool you are.
It has always been, that in warfare there are civilian casualties...the weaponry we have now causes the least amount of civilian casualties in the history of combat. To try and equate the INTENTIONAL killing / torture of a prisoner, while held under your control with civilian casualties during a combat mission is ****ing dumb.
You aren't confused because this is difficult, you are confused because you are a ****ing imbecile.
It is a war crime to torture or kill prisoners. It isn't a war crime if a civilian dies accidentally....It is a war crime if a soldier kills civillians on purpose (and the USA is one of the only places that prosecutes these crimes)
Now do you ****ing get it?
Or are you still a ****ing retard?