Originally Posted by Pants
So when a girl repeatedly says she doesn't want to have sex, then repeatedly says "No" as you climb her, then tries to push you off of her but isn't able to and keeps saying "No" as you stick your dick in, you're not a rapist. You're just a pushy shithead. Or do you think she's lying because she ended up jacking him off so he could blow his load and get the **** out? Imagine that was your daughter, how would you feel then?
What about this?
Does that sound more like rape to you? At least the head coach cried along with that one.
He's no longer a Tiger, you don't need to defend him.
Your version of the events came from the followup report, which differ greatly
from the initial police report. In the initial police report she very plainly states that she was not forced into having sex with him. And the officer clearly asks her followup questions designed to get her to speak to whether or not it was force or the threat of force that led to the intercourse.
By her followup report, she does add additional details that clearly paint a worse picture. At the same time, they're odd. Does a rapist stop halfway through, put on a condom and lay on the bed while his victim looks for her pants? And look at Dixon's reaction when she laid into him - "WTF? This is crazy"
Then she jerks him off and keeps texting him and trying to be friends with him. Oh, and when talking with him
says "what kind of person has sex with someone...." And the rape kit didn't show anything arising from this one either.
I know your side of the argument is always the easy one, but there are two clear sides to this story.
I haven't spoken to the 2010 incident as I haven't looked into it. I'm not inclined to engage in guess work.