Originally Posted by SNR
For the purposes of talking to this dumb**** NY Post reporter, Clark's educational background suited him just fine.
You can say he's a bad owner, but it's dumb as hell to call him stupid.
Book smarts will get you most places you need to go if you have the right attitude and commitment. I don't think Clark is a case of an educated idiot.
Are we to debate the clinical differences between making really bad choices when you have all the apparent faculties and resources needed to make great choices, and being stupid?
I guess "stupid" is less than being clinically retarded, "retarded" being based in chromosomes. So I guess we'll define his innate ability to make bad choices, without the apparent defense of chromosomal challenges, as being "a bad owner" but not stupid...
Dare I ask how we factor the money-grubbing gene into the chromosomes conversation. It may be having an impact on the performance of this team..