Originally Posted by Direckshun
That you agree with a biased source means even less.
Can you back your points up with anything that isn't a conservative shill site?
Can you discount it with anything other than a socialist shrill site? What's the difference? I ve read enough over the years about social security and the Ponzi scheme it is and find the column's data and conclusions entirely believable.
You asked for a source to back up my points, knowing full well it would likely be a conservative source then discount it as biased to make yourself sound above the partisan rhetoric and put your hands over your ears like a little girl. Your act is old. You need to change it. You're the DC's version of Wendler.
If you don't like the answer, don't ask the question in the first place.