Originally Posted by bobbything
I love it. You repeatedly say that you can't see the redundancy in King's statement(s); which I, and many, many, many others, seem to see. I did my best to explain it as simply as possible.
Bottom line, he could have worded it all much better; and considering he's a Senior Writer for SI, he should be expected to.
I completely and utterly disagree and have absolutely no issue with his wording, especially in the context of the paragraph.