Originally Posted by BucEyedPea
Scientific American was one out of about 30, btw
Peer review is not a perfect system.
links? credible links only, please.
peer-review works for several reasons, namely it keeps everyone honest and ensures that a high level of quality research is being done. shoddy work need not apply.
you know, like the shit you believe in. it couldn't (and doesn't) pass muster. I can understand why you're against peer-review.
yes--it may not be a 100% perfect system, but it has a pretty high P-value for significance. something that can't be said for your pseudoscience.