Originally Posted by listopencil
There is a pervading concept in his article that I wonder if you can shed some light on. It's this:
Is he saying that allowing SSM somehow infringes on the ability of others to practice their religious beliefs?
Yes, that's what he's saying. It's analogous to the controversy over Obamacare regulations that would require religious employers to include coverage for abortificants and contraception in employee health care insurance in violation of their beliefs.