Originally Posted by mcan
I see the potential children not born due to abortion as no different as the potential children not born because I haven't gotten anybody pregnant.
I just can't believe you don't see the difference between stopping a pregnancy from becoming a human being and taking a young child who is playing hide and seek and shooting him in the head. I just... I can't make heads or tails of the thought process.
I know this thread is now WAY off topic, but I go back to the thought experiment I used earlier. Lets say a terrorist has a nuclear bomb set to go off in New York city and he will give you the detonator if you shoot either me or a kindergardener. Well, I hope you choose to shoot me and save New York. It would suck, but I'd understand your decision and I'd be okay with that. But if that same terrorist said your choice was to either shoot me, or give a girl the day after pill... Man, I'd be pissed if you still felt like shooting me was the best choice. I wouldn't be pissed for very long though. But good luck integrating back into society once people find out what you did.
The argument isn't whether I can see the difference in your second paragraph, the argument is that life begins at conception. There is no way to deny that, and if it is life then killing the baby is not a choice.
Your last paragraph is an absurd illogical conclusion on your part.