Originally Posted by O.city
I'm not sure why exactly it hasn't happened, it's one of those things that don't make sense. I mean obviously the guy was smart enough or good enough to win one once, so he's a proven winner.
I don't understand it.
I think a lot of them become convinced that they were far more responsible for winning than they actually were. They become more decisive which leads to amplifying mistakes and the like.
It's why dick vermeil thought he could win without a defense and parcels thought he could win with Tony Romo.