View Single Post
Old 12-23-2012, 05:22 AM   #84
Mr. Flopnuts Mr. Flopnuts is offline
We have seen this all before..
 
Mr. Flopnuts's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: It's different this time!
Casino cash: $9947665
I just can't get behind a ban on armor piercing bullets. I know the military could wipe out anyone with ballistic missiles, and what not. I don't care. The idea of the 2nd amendment was to protect the people from a corrupt government. That's a big deal to me. Call it, Mr. Flopnuts' insurance policy. So, no. I can't get behind this.

Of course I like premise 1 and 2, and definitely 6. I can live with 5 if it's done correctly, but 3, and 4 are absolute deal breakers for me. The problem in my eyes is not guns, it's the nut bags that use them. I'd almost be okay with a psyche evaluation on prospective gun owners. But not limiting mags, or armor piercing bullets. Responsible gun owning members of society are the last people I worry about.
__________________
Donald Trump will be a hero to an entire generation of liberals by 2017. -6-16-2016
Posts: 53,433
Mr. Flopnuts is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Flopnuts is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Flopnuts is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Flopnuts is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Flopnuts is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Flopnuts is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Flopnuts is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Flopnuts is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Flopnuts is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Flopnuts is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Flopnuts is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote