Originally Posted by AustinChief
if that was my quote I certainly would be in a pickle.. except that wasn't what I said. I said you provided "stats from vastly dissimilar cultures" which makes them not viable "evidence" at all in this argument.
Ah, so you've now shrinked from your initial claim that the statistics I presented are not evidence to now saying the statistics I presented are not viable
Welcome back to logic. Except you're still wrong. Statistics from other Western countries are viable evidence, if we're going to actually apply the English language.
You may not agree that it's relevant enough
to apply to our current discussion, but it's certainly viable evidence.