Originally Posted by Direckshun
I would argue against assault weapons because of their capacity for death, not their existence in any particular tragedy.
and you'd be just as ****ing wrong. (using US definition) an "assault" weapon is not necessarily any more deadly than the sport version of the same rifle.
How many ****ing times does this need to be explained to you?
Banning folding stocks, pistol grips and bayonet mounts don't have shit to do with "capacity for death"