View Single Post
Old 12-31-2012, 09:08 AM   #160
chiefzilla1501 chiefzilla1501 is offline
MVP
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $121717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silock View Post
It's not just about money. If the trains operate at a low capacity, they will be far less green than current modes of transportation. You'd have to incentivize people to use it by raising tools and taxing cars, gas, flight and buses more than they are now. Not happening.

That's why many metro buses are far more inefficient and pollute more than cars. They simply don't carry enough people to justify their huge amount of pollution. Now imagine the heavy equipment and coal burning used to build and run the rail, and combine it with limited use. Other modes of travel quickly eclipse it on the green scale.
Ive heard both sides. But again, if we are talking ROI, this absolutely should be factored into the costs. Again why it's stupid for people to talk profit and loss. It works both ways. Costs are not just dollars spent. It's also stuff like if it creates more pollution than current alternatives.
Posts: 18,911
chiefzilla1501 is too fat/Omaha.chiefzilla1501 is too fat/Omaha.chiefzilla1501 is too fat/Omaha.chiefzilla1501 is too fat/Omaha.chiefzilla1501 is too fat/Omaha.chiefzilla1501 is too fat/Omaha.chiefzilla1501 is too fat/Omaha.chiefzilla1501 is too fat/Omaha.chiefzilla1501 is too fat/Omaha.chiefzilla1501 is too fat/Omaha.chiefzilla1501 is too fat/Omaha.
  Reply With Quote