Originally Posted by Exoter175
I think you mean, why sacrifice ILB value when you don't have to sacrifice QB value, ****stick.
I thought we wouldn't know anything until the combine got here? What makes you so confident that we won't be sacrificing QB value?
QBs WILL BE ****ING GONE. I've already given you a list of teams, but you systematically pooh-poohed each one for some dumbshit reason in spite of the fact that this is a QB driven league. For example, you're telling me that Buffalo won't take a QB because Fitzpatrick got a Cassel contract and is actually pretty good???
Go **** yourself. You're presenting valid arguments, but not good arguments. There's a difference.
"The Chiefs should draft Te'o because if they don't the earth will explode" is a valid argument. It's not a good one, though, because the premise is stupid and nonsensical. That's exactly what you're giving me. You're saying the Chiefs should draft Te'o because:
-Te'o is head and shoulders above the other ILBs
-The QBs likely aren't good enough to warrant the pick
-Plenty of great franchise-caliber QBs like Wilson and Barkley will be available in the second round
-Te'o is a special kind of player that all great teams need in order to win games
-Fitzpatrick is pretty good and other shitty reasons why other teams won't draft QBs in the first round
All of these are stupid. They're wrong. And if they're not wrong, then they require proof from the combine, which you told me I needed to prove any of my arguments, but apparently you don't need to wait for the combine. All of YOUR hypotheticals are fine to use. Mine aren't, though.
How does my logic taste, pillowbitergot?