Originally Posted by AustinChief
I love how your "reader's digest" version of the facts blatantly lies about CO2 levels to try to make him less wrong. The fact is, our CO2 levels rose MORE than even his most dire scenario was set up for.
It's not just CO2, its methane, CFCs, volcanoes, and everything else that goes into the forcings. More information which clearly shows that the forcing follows scenario B most closely:
Doing a little research on my own, scenario A assumed exponential increases in global warming gases, while scenario B was a linear increase. If you look at emissions data both CO2 and methane increases have been linear, while CFC emissions have decreased. So where you get the idea that our emissions have been above scenario A I have no idea.