Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini
Dont like that move at all. Taking the strongest part of the defense and depleting it. Hali always got his shit pushed in against the run and youll have 2 unknowns at defensive tackle plus who will be the other d end? **** that.
If they bring in the 4-3 under, they're actually leveraging the strongest part of the defense.
Again, the 4-3 under would be a way to run the 4-3 with our existing personnel and not have to shoehorn the defense.
I will say this. A 1-gap 4-3 under is INFINITELY better than the 2-gap SHIT we've seen the last couple of years, 3-4 or not.