Originally Posted by whoman69
I don't think the argument against them is totally fair, as accurate as it may be. Kiper tries to post himself as some great judge of talent. All their either of them really do is to try to guess where these players should be drafted. Kiper is more a self promoter who got himself a gig at a fledgling ESPN when they started covering the draft because he was the only draft wonk out there at the time.
I'm not sure why. They tell people, and enjoy other people telling them, that they are draft experts.
Sooooo Kiper can suck it.
I would still like to see evidence of someone having a consistently high percentage of hits.