Originally Posted by aturnis
Breaking into somebody's home is stupid. It doesn't have to end in death. If she shot him, and clearly gained the upper hand, she should have stopped, let the cops pick him up and let a jury decide his fate.
You idiots probably defend cops who murder idiots.
She had the upper hand? The guy wasn't stopped. He was able to walk out of the house. He could have used his tools he broke in with to hit the woman or children if he hadn't left. Just stop shooting a guy who is still able to move freely towards you. You shoot until the guy isn't a threat anymore. Someone with tools to break into your home, who actively sought you out by breaking through multiple locked doors was still able to walk away and drive off after being shot. After those 5 rounds he was still a threat. He wasn't a threat until he fell over dead, became unconscious from blood loss,or left the area. He left, she didn't shoot him in the back on his way out, and you just want her to shoot once and stop because she "clearly gained the upper hand"? You're insane.