Thread: U.S. Issues The "bearing arms" debate...
View Single Post
Old 01-11-2013, 11:31 AM   #44
BucEyedPea BucEyedPea is offline
BucPatriot
 
BucEyedPea's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: None of your business
Casino cash: $112048
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmo20002 View Post
I ****ing asked like 5 times if you thought the 2nd Am guaranteed a private, personal right to a nuclear weapon and you dance around with all this stuff about militias and where the nuke is kept.
Nope. I did not. There's no mention of any adjective of "personal" or "private" just a "right to "bear" and "keep." You narrowed it down when the Framers didn't do that. Of course, it allows private and personal too. I explained how the nukes apply. You are incapable of understanding what I posted.

Quote:
If I asked about a basic hangun, you would have said "Yes." When I ask about typically military-level weaponry, you start babbling. I get it--you're afraid to admit that there are ANY restictions allowed by the 2nd Am.
Nope. I didn't.
__________________
Posts: 56,906
BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote