Thread: U.S. Issues The "bearing arms" debate...
View Single Post
Old 01-11-2013, 12:08 PM   #60
cosmo20002 cosmo20002 is online now
Debunking your bullshit
 
cosmo20002's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: KC area
Casino cash: $41416
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea View Post
Yeah, you needing a simple "yes" or "no" answer doesn't apply because it can't be done using your simple-minded two-valued logic.
You're just trying to frame the debate in order to score an automatic win but which disallows looking at it thoroughly. Or as if there is not an answer between the two extremes.

You made a ridiculous hypothetical unlikely to happen. As stated earlier cost aka markets would make it prohibitive.
Complete cop-out. First, people use hypotheticals all the time for analysis of any number of things. Second, it is not cost-prohibitive. It wouldn't cost billions to make a crude but useful nuclear weapon.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by petegz28 View Post
Did planes hit the 2 WTC towers? Yes. Ah but were they the airliners we were told they were? Evidence and physics seems to say NO!

What about the Pentagon?? Again it appears it would...defy physics.
Posts: 23,596
cosmo20002 is obviously part of the inner Circle.cosmo20002 is obviously part of the inner Circle.cosmo20002 is obviously part of the inner Circle.cosmo20002 is obviously part of the inner Circle.cosmo20002 is obviously part of the inner Circle.cosmo20002 is obviously part of the inner Circle.cosmo20002 is obviously part of the inner Circle.cosmo20002 is obviously part of the inner Circle.cosmo20002 is obviously part of the inner Circle.cosmo20002 is obviously part of the inner Circle.cosmo20002 is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote