Originally Posted by Fish
That study doesn't seem very useful though.
It includes nuggets like this:
But what are we supposed to do with that information? That's like saying "Most vehicle accidents happen within 10 miles of your home." Yes, that's true. You should move, and perhaps your odds of not getting in a vehicle accident will improve. Right?
But think about the statement. It doesn't say that a suicide would be prevented by not having a gun in the house. It just says that when a gun is available, the odds are higher that it would be a gun that's used as opposed to pills or hanging. It says nothing to the safety of the actual weapon. Only that when a suicidal person has choices available, the odds are higher they will choose the most effective method available. Shocker. And why are they even including suicide anyway?
Also, there's this:
They include the potential for intimidation to support their results. So they're essentially saying it's easier to scare someone when you have a gun, therefore guns are bad and makes a home less safe. Which conveniently, makes any home with a gun a "Greater risk".
They even admit to these problems in the actual study:
You think? Hmmm.
Meme??? what else would you expect from one of the batshit craziest posters here ever? Seriously has this train wreck ever, and I mean ever posted anything of value here?
The person who is certain, and who claims divine warrant for his certainty, belongs now to the infancy of our species. Hitch~