Radio personality Anthony Cumia makes some salient points:
What about the mental health clause in the new law?
Isn’t that very vague and very subjective? It just seems to me that if the situation arises and they just don’t want somebody to have a gun, they absolutely have a way to do it without any due process. You can be judged incompetent and they can just take your guns away without any recourse.
And what happened with confidentiality between a doctor and patient? Where’s the criteria? Where is the line? Who decides the difference between someone who dealing with depression and anxiety and someone who wants to do harm with a gun? Where is that line? Who makes that judgement?