Originally Posted by BucEyedPea
Do you honestly think, San Francisco would not elect someone similar to Nancy Pelosi?
Or Feinstein from the People's Republic of California? I mean it's the moonbat state with lots of poor illegals and Hispanics. These seats are known as very safe seats. The problem is the people from that area.
Here's another thing. We usually hear how the approval rating of congress is so low. I frankly don't see a difference between the 11% from the 9%. What is missing from such a poll is what it is about congress most people don't like. I'd like to see a breakdown on that. I mean if Obama's ratings are so much better, is it because they're blocking his agenda or is it because they're not blocking it enough. I wonder if any tally by category has a large enough majority to matter? Polls show spending is a problem but Obama wants more, gets re-elected and the Rs complain about it but still give him what he wants on spending. There's some sort of disconnection imo.
People may hate congress but it looks to me that some districts don't feel it applies to their rep.
I understand that the Kalifornia ****tards would elect another Pelosi clone. But it wouldn't be Pelosi - entrenched and connected. The main benefit would be regularly shaking up committee assignments - no Ted Stevens endlessly funneling billions to Alaska, for example (see, I used a Republic example - maybe ****mo200002 will stop crying now).