It's actually easier to shoot a non-pistol griped gun from the hip than one with.
It's nothing more than a scary term. The dumb ****ing na´ve liberals in this country hear it and go apeshit retard over the term, without a clue on what it is. It just sounds bad to them. Same reason the last ban featured removal of such other evil words;
Barrel shroud... Oh my, the shoulder thing that goes up?, or maybe it just prevents a person from touching a hot barrel. A safety feature. Oh my god! We must ban it!
Bayonet lug... Oh my, that sounds so evil, a person could mount a knife to the end of a gun and stab someone if they run out of ammo. Despite the fact that a bayonet mounted to a rifle has never been used in a crime to date. We must ban it.
Flash hider... Personally I can't recall one instance of a shooter being located by the flash signature that would have otherwise went unnoticed. But yet it sounds evil, we must ban it!
Collapsible stock... Oh my god!!! A criminal might be able to reduce the outline of their rifle from 32" to 26". Holy shit. Disregard the fact that they could just mount a shorter stock to begin with, or remove it altogether. Nope we need to ban it. After all why would we want to allow women, who generally prefer a shorter stock, to use one more comfortably. Why does the left hate women so much?
Worthless, make the libs feel better, bullshit legislation.
Posted via Mobile Device