Originally Posted by Priest31kc
Geno at 93.0 and the next QB at 85.8........But let's draft a LT or DT and wait until the 2nd or 3rd round to draft the 3rd or 4th or 5th or 6th best QB!!!!11!!
I fully agree with you. In fact if they DON'T
trade down &/or take Geno or Wilson in the first ... (yes, being aware of Russel Wilson was taken later) then, I'd just as soon they not draft a QB in the 2nd.
Take a quality player at another position that will help us more.
I really like Clark hiring Dorsey ... like his scouting background (maybe that is why ***** was terrible at drafting and Haley had problems with him), but I'm afraid Dorsey will bypass a QB in the 1st. because of his stupid BPA ... then he'll have to piece together 3rd. tier QB's ... we'll win games but never get close to the SB because we don't have the QB. Look I'm no talent scout, but it seems to me Geno is exactly the QB who will flourish under Andy ... therefore, if that is true, even if there are 31 players ahead of him on the BPA ... you need a QB that you think will flourish ... you take him. To heck with BPA!!!
He can say BPA because Green Bay has had 2 ... not 1 but 2 elite QB's. You can draft a Rodgers late in the first round as BPA when you have Farve. But, elite QB's are difficult to come by, so you better take him when you have a chance. Yes, draft BPA when your need is at other position, coz there is more opportunities to fill them.
I'm concerned because of the Jake Long illustration ... Miami passed on Matt Ryan to draft Long. But, what good did Long do them without a QB?