Originally Posted by Prison Bitch
Wait - so you're saying that the bill the Governor of Washington pushed for....which specifically proved my assertion that the State can and will potentially wield punishment to force this....isn't valid because it had to be watered down prior to passage?
If that's your argument, it's a terrible rebuttal.
My argument is pretty simple. Churches aren't affected by Washington's law, as you seemed to have been implying. They aren't. Your "could have been" argument is meaningless.