Originally Posted by siberian khatru
So according to Banks, Smith isn't worth taking at No. 1 "for value," but he's OK three spots later at 4?
A QB-starved franchise shouldn't "reach" three spots for a player?
I can only guess they are writing this Jeockel crap because of the uncertain Albert situation. Whatever the case, even if we had nothing at LT, id still take a QB #1. Even if Joeckel is the next Orlando Pace combined with Anthony Muzoz, you still take a QB #1.