View Single Post
Old 01-25-2013, 08:34 PM   #697
Rambozo Rambozo is offline
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2013
Casino cash: $5000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish View Post
Why would busting on a QB be worse than busting on a OL or LB with the first pick? The money isn't going to be any different.
.
Learning curve.

You are overthinking this. QBs are given more time to develop than any other position and for good reason. It's the hardest position to transition from college to pro. While you are waiting to find out for 2, 3, 4, or 5 years for your mediocre QB to develop, you are missing out on real ones. By the time you do try again, the players you drafted after him are ready to hit free agency.

You can say we should draft a QB year after year until we get one but, that's not going to happen. it's not realistic to do that over and over in the first round. If you do, your team will get old or leave via free agency and you won't have anything but a QB. You aren't going to be the Colts if you do that. It's not about money. It's about the loss of talent.

You guys can dream all night and day but, reality is very different. I think most Chiefs fans get it. For some reason, there are a lot of people here who don't. Maybe it's the stupid first round QB in Superbowls argument?

If you are a Chiefs fan, you shouldn't even be talking about a superbowl let alone a playoff win. You are like little kids asking for a b-day pony. It ain't going to happen guys. You can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit.
Posts: 459
Rambozo < CasselRambozo < CasselRambozo < CasselRambozo < CasselRambozo < CasselRambozo < CasselRambozo < CasselRambozo < CasselRambozo < CasselRambozo < CasselRambozo < Cassel
  Reply With Quote