Originally Posted by patteeu
Yes. Of course it does.
Let me run this one past you. The reason for invading Iraq was either Saddam had active WMD programs or he had plans to reconstitute his WMD programs after sanctions crumbled. Really, what's the ****ing difference? Does it change anything whatsoever?
I don't see how the decision on whether to invade Iraq is of any relevant comparison to Benghazi.