Originally Posted by O.city
Well, I'd hope you would consider me to be a little more informed and do my own judgement not basing it on the talking head mock drafting guys.
And yes, I'm sure they are more informed. They are paid to be and have connections. All we are doing is speculating.
I'm speculating that based on his last half season of game tape, he has some questions to answer. I could say that his system got figured out and Holgorson is a moron, that he wasn't as bad as every one said, and that there were other factors playing into that, but I don't want to get shackled with being a Geno ite or whatever.
So I'm just going to say that, I would like to see him throw at the combine, but if he's being told "Hey, the Chiefs are already locked into you at 1" yeah I wouldn't throw.
But I don't personally see that being the case.
Why don't you see that being the case?
What I am seeing Is paralysis by analysis. We've heard so many times that this class of QBs is weak and there is no Luck that we're subconsciously looking for reasons why the Chiefs might not take him.
If there's one thing I am pretty sure of its that we care A LOT more about whether he throws at the combine than the NFL teams do. They've got his tape and they know even more than we do what they are watching.
At the combine, they want to sit in a room with him and pick his brain. If he throws, that's the icing on the cake.
As for being labeled a Geno-ite, I can't imagine why you would say that. You would prefer to ignore the TRUTH in hopes that people wouldn't label you as being subjective? That's just crazy talk.
Was Sam Bradford a sure fire #1 pick? Because I sure as hell don't see a lot of difference.