Originally Posted by RyFo18
In hindsight, what is wrong with the Tyson Jackson pick? We got a decent starter out of him (at a position that was sorely needed). Has anyone even looked at the rest of the 2009 draft? It's filled with busts.
The top 10 wasn't great, no.
But you could have taken almost ANYBODY that went between 10 and 25 and it would have been a better pick than Tyson Jackson.