Originally Posted by petegz28
Again, you are going to make a terrible litigator. Let me ask you this, does a reporter have to have a specific take on every story they report? And moreso is their take relevant to reporting a story at all?
I disagree he will fit in perfectly. Court is not setup in a debate format. It is all about winning over the jury. Saying things for effect and redirecting, diverting from harmful testimony. Saying things knowing there will be a sustained objection. It is nothing like a face to face debate. Like him or not the kid can argue~
“With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion"