View Single Post
Old 02-05-2013, 06:01 AM   #42
mdchiefsfan mdchiefsfan is offline
Supporter
 
mdchiefsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Casino cash: $3253904
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRichard View Post
Don't know if anyone has thrown out this possible scenario but isn't it possible they don't draft a qb first over all then they do some sort of trade with our early second and maybe next years first to jump up high enough to still grab a decent qb?
The reason I don't like that is this class is talented but shallow. You drop off from the top two QBs (who will need development too) and you find yourself starting a real project. The risk isn't worth the extra pick, because:

1- You can get the top rated QB with the first overall

2- there isn't another player that stands out as the clear cut #1 player in the draft that is a must have/can't miss prospect.

You're just hamstringing yourself at the most important position by losing a pick to try and fill that position with less talent.
Posts: 10,760
mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote