Originally Posted by cosmo20002
Standard were set out defending the legality of the attack on AQ in Yemen. Occupy Wall Street wouldn't meet those standards.
You didn't read the memo or the article very carefully then. Neither establishes a threshold for this type of action. They point out reasons why the al-Awlaki killing is acceptable, but they go out of their way to say that those reasons aren't minimum requirements. IOW, no standard is set and a strike against OWS isn't ruled out (although it's certainly unlikely, IMO).
"[The democrat party] has become a left wing party, that's anti-American, and thatís racist." - David Horowitz