Originally Posted by KC_Connection
They shot better than the team they played in a tough road environment (this suggests they were the better team). They also got to the line more than OU in a tough road environment (this suggest they were the better team). What cost them greatly was going 11 for 20 on FTs (which isn't expected for that group) and having low percentage shooters hit some big shots down the stretch (which can't be controlled). I'm not quite understanding what's difficult ?
You just watched a game we led about 20 seconds, and you deduced that we were actually better. You can't be serious.