Originally Posted by Amnorix
Yes, you have clearly explained your position, and you're entitled to your opinion. But you're wrong. There really is no colorable argument that Ratzinger is the worst Pope ever. The entire theory doesn't make a goddamn bit of sense.
Which demonstrates that you're either ignorant or stupid. I'll choose the former, but if you want to argue the latter, that's fine too.
Can we at least get you to admit he was probably the worst Pope in the last 200 years?