Originally Posted by htismaqe
There's a logical fallacy in your line of thinking, though.
Star is a VERY similar prospect, to Jackson especially. If Jackson is a bust, there's no rational reason to take Star and expect it to turn out differently.
no they're not. Star is higher rated than Jackson was. Jackson was seen as a 3-4 DE first, who could maybe play DT. Star is a 4-3 DT that could play DE in the 3-4.