Originally Posted by patteeu
In other words, violence against women was already illegal and Republican opposition to this spending bill aimed at funneling money to democrat constituents is completely different than any softness on violence against women.
I'm not ignoring it. None of it justifies this spending in terms of cost effectiveness. None of what you posted even considered the opportunity costs of this legislation.
You're just repeating your conclusions. I could honestly reply to this but I'd just be reposting shit from earlier in the thread, which you dismissed but hardly rebutted.
We're hitting a dead end.