Originally Posted by jAZ
MC was a far better bet at the time than the alternative being considered in Mark Sanchez. More certainty, less cost. Looking back, they had the same success. And as a result, Matt Cassel was factually a better investment even looking back.
Yeah, what about Josh Freeman? ***** failed, hardcore. If he had any idea that Matt Cassel was shitty, he would NEVER have given him 60m.
You are such a shitty homer.
And "looking back" at least Mark Sanchez won playoff games. Matt never came close.
Wrong again, homer.